Sunday, September 16, 2012

Mother Savage phase 2


Mother Savage is a short story written by Guy de Maupassant it takes place during the Franco-Prussian war of the 1870s. Mother Savage’s Son volunteered for the war leaving her all alone. Since she was well off and had money when the Prussians came they were billeted with family’s in the village and since Mother Savage had money she was given four Prussians to care for. Guy de Maupassant's "Mother Savage" illustrates the seemingly ambivalent way that people can go from "enemy" to "neutral" to "friend." Ambivalence is a state of having simultaneous, conflicting feelings toward a person or thing. When the four young Prussians arrived they were in conquered territory so naturally they were enemies of the peasants. But the Prussians started helping around the house, cleaning windows, bringing food home they realized she was old and frail and tried to make the situation as best as she could for them. “In short, doing all the chores like four good boys working for their own mother”(78).  She took a bonding to them, and became their “friends” so its surprising the way the story ends “She liked them well enough, too, those four enemies of hers”(78). When the letter arrived informing Mother Savage of her sons death, something inside of her snapped, she realized that the Prussians are not her friends, they killed her son so she sat I thought of revenge. She was taking a liking to the four boys but what do you do when your son was killed by the fellow countrymen of the people you called “friends”. I’m sure she had conflicting feelings about her plan to murder the soldiers but that didn’t stop her, she wanted revenge. She wanted their mothers know how it felt to lose a son. The ambivalence between friend and enemy is a central theme to the story. The Prussian soldiers did everything to make her comfortable and they thought of her as a friend since she was so kind to them and gave no hints of stabbing them in the back. But its nothing they did, when Mother Savage decided they were enemies and slaughtered them.    
The title is foreshadowing in itself “was this their name or nickname”(77) that phrase right there gets you thinking that maybe its not their surname like you would think. How can this sweet old woman be a savage? As the story comes to the end, you understand that Mother Savage is her nickname for what she did for the soldiers. “You can write them how this all happened, and you can tell their parents that I was the one who did it- I, Victoire Simon, The Savage! Never forget it”(82) she made the soldiers think they were safe and even convinced them that putting straw up in the loft with them would make them warmer and they even helped! They helped her in her plan to kill them.
The story also uses the literally device of a flashback to tell the story. When discussing the family that used to live there, “I also recalled that the good woman who lived there had asked me in, one day when I was bone-tired….” (77). It shows that people in the area thought fondly of her and she was a nice old woman that would help a fellow person in need. But everyone has a dark side and all it took for Mother Savage’s to come out was the death of her son. 

5 comments:

  1. I really like that you use the term "ambivalence". It's a perfect description of Mother Savage's feelings towards the soldiers. When I read about her taking the names and addresses of the boys I thought that she was doing a courtesy to the mothers. It's not a huge courtesy considering she's killing their sons, but I felt that it was one mother sparing other mothers the torture of wondering whether their sons are alive or dead. I agree on the reason she killed the soldiers though, pure revenge.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice thoughts, Josh. I can see how it is difficult to even write about Mother Savage in this response! On the one hand, she is a sweet old lady, but on the other she is a savage killer.

    I think what I find most haunting about the story is that I really think she did care for the four soldiers as if they were her sons. Right? She cared for them, genuinely. But in one day, she could completely change her mind about them. She could go from seeing them as her sons to wanting them to die.

    I think of the repetition of the animal being ripped in half, and I think it is a proper visual for the kind of complete turnaround that Mother Savage experiences. Her son, the rabbit, even Mother Savage when she is shot—they are all ripped savagely in half. It's almost like there are two distinct sides fighting to get torn apart in everyone in the story: the desire to save and kill, to live and die, to feed and to set on fire. What is scary is that both sides are held by all of the people all of the time. It's unnerving to think that the person who feeds you also contains the power to kill you.

    Maybe I am reading too much into things? What do you think, Josh? I am intrigued in particular by your last line, "everyone has a dark side and all it took for Mother Savage's to come out was the death of her son."

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't think you are reading too much into things, I feel like those images were all put there on purpose to bring the harsh imagery of war right to the surface. Nothing is really fair in war and this story shows it with people being cut in half by bullets and cannon balls and burning people alive. They are tough images to picture but I really think Meupassant put the images in there on purpose to bring parallels between characters and that it really seems like every person in the story is a savage not just the mother.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I didn't even catch the repetition of things getting torn in half, but thinking about it, how often do people get torn in half by bullets? that doesn't happen often, so i do think he means something more. I really like that idea that everyone has two sides to them and Meupassant was most likely trying to get that point across to the readers. She did care for the soldiers, even tho she gruesomely murdered them, she had it in her heart to at least get their names and ask to send letters to their mothers, but was it out of spite? or did she care for them enough to not want their families to wonder where their sons were and what happened to them, At least the families will have closure.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Why do you think this nice and caring old woman would want to cause the four soldiers mothers grief too?
    I know revenge is the driving factor in this story but wouldn't it have just been best for mother savage to suck it up and not cause anyone anymore grief. It doesn't make since to me why she chose to take out her anger on four men she grew to see as sons. But let me back track here, her son volunteered to join the war. Odds are he knew dying was a possibility. Do you think mother savage could have better prepared for her son going to war and sparred four innocent lives?

    ReplyDelete