Sunday, October 7, 2012


Brave New World: Utopia?

Phase 2 Prompt 3

                The society in Huxley’s Brave New World is a utopia in the sense that it was a perfect and ideal civilization, because everybody was content with the role they contributed to the benefit of the community.   Many examples throughout the text highlight this content or satisfaction that each member of this society had, whether they were an Alpha Plus or an Epsilon.  It can be seen as a utopia because everybody had a job and got what they wanted, making them happy.  It was a stable world where nothing was questioned and nothing was out of the ordinary.

                The conversation the world controller, Mustapha Mond, had with Savage really displays how this world could be viewed as a utopia.  Mustapha explains to the Savage, otherwise known as John, how society is in a better place than before due to the fact that everybody is happy now. Mustapha tells John, “The world’s stable now.  People are happy; they get what they want, and they never want what they can’t get” (Huxley 220).  This stability helped the people feel safe.  They didn’t have any desires they could not fulfill. Most of the troubles that real life society has today are due to humans desiring things they cannot have; things such as other’s possessions or wealth.  Some of the lower-class people may envy the upper-class as they feel they have better lives going for them.  Such feelings did not exist in Huxley’s Brave New World because each class of the society was conditioned to enjoy the work of that class and nothing else.  For example, the Epsilons although they were the lower caste of society, they were perfectly happy with their menial work.  Mustapha Mond describes to John, “Only an Epsilon can be expected to make Epsilon sacrifices, for the good reason that for him they aren’t sacrifices…His conditioning has laid down rails along which he’s got to run” (Huxley 222).  Epsilons were conditioned to do Epsilon work, while Alphas were conditioned to do Alpha work.  When everyone is content with their position there is no fighting or chaos.  On the contrary, if an Alpha was given an Epsilon job then some problems would occur. Their society had an “optimum population… is modeled on the iceberg-eight-ninths below the water line, one-ninth above” (Huxley 223).

                Another reason why this society could be conveyed as utopian is there were no strong feelings such as passion for a loved one or extreme hatred for another person.  There were no such things as parents, children, husband, and wives. Thus, there were no such things as a love triangle or war.  In terms of sexuality, kids and adults alike were allowed to do what they wanted without any restraints. “Many of the natural impulses are allowed free play, that there really aren’t any temptations to resist” (Huxley 237).  Without any temptations, humans did not have to go through that self-struggle of controlling their bodies from doing things against their conscience.  If anything did go wrong, there was soma which seems to make the characters in the novel get away from reality.  It also had a calming effect and because of this there was no tension.  These reasons could make any person believe that Huxley’s world was actually a utopia instead of a dystopia.

               
Works Cited
 

Huxley, Aldous. Brave New World. New York: HarperPerennial, 1998. Print. 

 

11 comments:

  1. you make a lot of good points, i wrote the same thing and agree 100% with you. Everyone in society has their place and are happy with it! The government in Brave New World is not stagnant either. The book mentions what happened when they tried to make a whole society of alphas and it ended in disaster. They have tried to go back and create everyone equal and see if it can work this time around and it didn't. This society is continuing to try and make things better for their citizens and too me it shows that its an Utopian society. In the book Bernard and Helmholtz are not happy so they send them off. Is it ok for the Government to sacrifice the happiness of a few for the whole?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like what you mentioned about Soma and it sort of makes for a contradictory argument, like if this society is so perfect why is there even a need for it in the first place you know? I look at in a way that humans aren't perfect and there are always going to be times that you can't take into account to where soma comes in and helps but if you are engineering humans to be perfect and know their role then there wouldn't really be a chance for them to break away. I think I sort of believe in the first part where there are always things you can't take into account but then does that really make it a utopia?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well in a sense you do have a point when you say if this society is so perfect, then why do I do they need soma? I think the soma made some of the people even feel more like there in a perfect world free from all stresses. Even though in reality they may have something that bothered them, with soma their minds were in a happy place. It may have not been real, but it was real to them.

      Delete
  3. Eugenio, I really like how you defend the Utopian aspect of the society. It may not be the popular opinion, but I do see the Brave New World as a good basis for a Utopia. I say basis because there were those who were unhappy with the society, such as Bernard and Helmholtz. Bernard was unhappy because he was different due to a mistake during his "incubation". Helmholtz was unhappy because he wanted to write. Allowing him to right, bound by his conditioning to write only socially approved material, would not have created an issue if his writings were made available only to the upper class. Aside from these easily corrected problems, everyone in the society is happy, so I feel that it was a Utopia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Michael, yes this "utopian" society did have its flaws as not everybody was happy with the positions they were in. Although Bernard was part of the upper-class society, he did not feel like it because he looked like a delta. Helmhotz you could say was denied free will because he was prohibited from some sorts of writing. In the world we live in today, there could never be a perfect in-every-detail utopian society. As humans we are born imperfect and we all make mistakes.

      Delete
  4. I like that you said the society was a utopia. I read BNW in high school and the entire time all I could think was how terrible these people were to create a society and basically "play god" in the seance that they were able to determine who was what. But your post makes me actually see it from the utopian side of it. It's really kind of brilliant actually, no one wants what they can't have and I like that you pointed that out. But don't you think these people are more like robots than actual human beings? They are conditioned to do certain things and want only certain things so doesn't that take away free will?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I completely agree with you Connor. Freedom of choice is an important aspect of our society. Taking away that freedom takes away the very essence of what makes you, "you." In BNW the citizens aren't living for themselves, but for the scientist who created them.

      Delete
    2. The whole society in BNW is in a loop. The scientist who created them were also themselves created. There is no evil government that controls the life of anyone in BNW. If all the alphas, betas, etc in BNW decided to stop with conditioning and having babies instead of creating them they could do it. there is no one really to stop them. If the story turned out different and John decided to rise up and become a leader and convince people to stop taking soma who would stop it? Its a matter of choice for the people. Their free will is not taken away by any means they choose to stay conditioned. Conditioning doesn't work for Bernard or Helmholz both feel lonely in their given life. same goes with leinna who falls in love with John. Im sure they are not the only people feeling this way. Human emotion always finds its way out.

      Delete
  5. Connor, I love that you mentioned taking away free will. I think without free will it isn't a utopia...that's just my opinion. Maybe it's because of the "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" that we have here. If I weren't able to determine my own unique happiness and seek it myself, and was just given a care free life and drugs...I think I'd be unsatisfied. It's human nature to always want more. But in Brave New World, human nature is a lot different. There are still a few individuals that are unsatisfied with society like Bernard...but I wondered if that was really because of his conditioning or if there was some flaw in the system. How come Bernard and Helmholtz want more? Why aren't they content as is?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with your perspective where choice and free will are largely what determine having a Utopia but it's a really tricky situation because you will then have people that take advantage of people's happiness. I think Bernard and Helmholtz aren't content because they have gotten a taste of freedom (Bernard with visiting places outside of London and Helmholtz with his writing) and now can't go back to the artificial life of being told what to do and soma for the pain. I think it sort of the way of having a really great bowl of pho in Vietnam on a trip and then coming back to America where the only thing that's served is the American version of the dish and it just doesn't taste the same so you sort of have to lower your expectations of the dish or you can set out to get all the ingredients and spend time recreating it for yourself. After you have the best how can you go back to the artificial life?

      Delete
    2. Magan, being accepted is one of the most important things for humans to feel. Everybody wants to feel like their accepted and loved by their peers. Its in our nature to want to be part of something- a group. Bernard was not accepted by society in the beginning, but when he introduced the savage he became socially popular in his society. During this time, he was very content. Its a little more difficult to explain Helmhotz's situation. He had alot going for him in this society, but he felt like he was being controlled in a way and this made him unhappy.

      Delete